Discussion about this post

User's avatar
WattyAlan Reports's avatar

Nita, this syllabus captures how law is finally beginning to mirror the structure of the technology it seeks to regulate. The sequencing, from model training to accountability, reflects the lifecycle of AI itself.

I recently published a paper titled “Linguistic Homogenization in AI-Generated Content: Cultural Impacts and Implications for AI Safety and Control,” exploring how repetitive rhetorical patterns in LLM outputs influence public reasoning and discourse diversity. It seems increasingly relevant to the “bias and fairness” and “manipulation and deception” topics in your course. The legal frameworks you’re teaching could one day determine how we classify and mitigate these subtle linguistic risks, where persuasion becomes a form of governance itself.

Illegal Experiments's avatar

Thank you professor Farahany. We need your work.

Three Questions.

Will you address:

1) AI and Special Access Programs and Projects?

2) AI and the hostile targeting of groups — including nations — and individuals?

3) Are you aware of any people who are discussing legal action against AI used in the hostile psychological manipulation of human beings?

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?